CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1060
vs BenQ DC C850

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1060

BenQ / 2008

DC C1060

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C850

BenQ / 2008

DC C850

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1060
25 mm²
DC C850
Area ratio
1.15:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
14.6%

The DC C1060 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC C1060MetricDC C850
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight140 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1060 has the larger sensor area. The DC C1060 and DC C850 have the same body weight. The DC C1060 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C1060 and DC C850 were both released in 2008. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1060

Released in 2008, DC C1060 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C850

Released in 2008, DC C850 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras