CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1030 Eco
vs BenQ DC E1020

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1030 Eco

BenQ / 2009

DC C1030 Eco

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1020

BenQ / 2009

DC E1020

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1030 Eco
28 mm²
DC E1020
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C1030 Eco and DC E1020 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C1030 EcoMetricDC E1020
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1030 Eco and DC E1020 have the same sensor area. The DC C1030 Eco and DC E1020 have the same body weight. The DC C1030 Eco and DC E1020 have the same effective resolution. The DC C1030 Eco and DC E1020 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1030 Eco

Released in 2009, DC C1030 Eco has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E1020

Released in 2009, DC E1020 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras