CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1020
vs BenQ DC E1220

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1020

BenQ / 2009

DC C1020

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1220

BenQ / 2009

DC E1220

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1020
28 mm²
DC E1220
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C1020 and DC E1220 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C1020MetricDC E1220
10 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.69 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.85 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
35.14 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorage—
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1020 and DC E1220 have the same sensor area. The DC E1220 has the lighter body. The DC E1220 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C1020 and DC E1220 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1020

Released in 2009, DC C1020 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E1220

Released in 2009, DC E1220 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras