CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC 4330
vs BenQ DC C35

Archive illustration for BenQ DC 4330

BenQ / 2003

DC 4330

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C35

BenQ / 2004

DC C35

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC 4330
25 mm²
DC C35
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC 4330 and DC C35 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 4330MetricDC C35
3.3 MPEffective pixels3.21 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.74 µmPixel pitch2.78 µm
7.53 µm²Pixel area7.74 µm²
13.29 MP/cm²Pixel density12.92 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight144 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 4330 and DC C35 have the same sensor area. The DC C35 has the lighter body. The DC 4330 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C35 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 4330

Released in 2003, DC 4330 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.3 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C35

Released in 2004, DC C35 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.21 MP effective resolution, and a 144 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras