CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC 3410
vs BenQ DC C30

Archive illustration for BenQ DC 3410

BenQ / 2003

DC 3410

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C30

BenQ / 2004

DC C30

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DC 3410
25 mm²
DC C30
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
63.8%

The DC C30 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 3410MetricDC C30
2.1 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.69 µmPixel pitch2.73 µm
7.22 µm²Pixel area7.44 µm²
13.85 MP/cm²Pixel density13.45 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight147 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C30 has the larger sensor area. The DC 3410 has the lighter body. The DC C30 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C30 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 3410

Released in 2003, DC 3410 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C30

Released in 2004, DC C30 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 147 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras