CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC 3400
vs BenQ DC E41

Archive illustration for BenQ DC 3400

BenQ / 2004

DC 3400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E41

BenQ / 2004

DC E41

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DC 3400
25 mm²
DC E41
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
63.8%

The DC E41 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC 3400MetricDC E41
2 MPEffective pixels4.23 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.75 µmPixel pitch2.42 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area5.87 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density17.03 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
135 gWeight127 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC E41 has the larger sensor area. The DC E41 has the lighter body. The DC E41 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 3400 and DC E41 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 3400

Released in 2004, DC 3400 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E41

Released in 2004, DC E41 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.23 MP effective resolution, and a 127 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras