CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC 3400
vs BenQ DC C420

Archive illustration for BenQ DC 3400

BenQ / 2004

DC 3400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C420

BenQ / 2005

DC C420

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DC 3400
25 mm²
DC C420
Area ratio
1.64:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
63.8%

The DC C420 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 3400MetricDC C420
2 MPEffective pixels4 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.75 µmPixel pitch2.49 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area6.21 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density16.1 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
135 gWeight130 g
Secure DigitalStorage—
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery—

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C420 has the larger sensor area. The DC C420 has the lighter body. The DC C420 has the higher effective resolution. The DC C420 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 3400

Released in 2004, DC 3400 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C420

Released in 2005, DC C420 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras