CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC 3400
vs BenQ DC 3410

Archive illustration for BenQ DC 3400

BenQ / 2004

DC 3400

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC 3410

BenQ / 2003

DC 3410

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DC 3400
15 mm²
DC 3410
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC 3400 and DC 3410 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 3400MetricDC 3410
2 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.75 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area7.22 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density13.85 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
135 gWeight120 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 3400 and DC 3410 have the same sensor area. The DC 3410 has the lighter body. The DC 3410 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 3400 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 3400

Released in 2004, DC 3400 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC 3410

Released in 2003, DC 3410 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras