CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC 2300
vs BenQ DC 3400

Archive illustration for BenQ DC 2300

BenQ / 2003

DC 2300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC 3400

BenQ / 2004

DC 3400

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
DC 2300
15 mm²
DC 3400
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC 2300 and DC 3400 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 2300MetricDC 3400
1.92 MPEffective pixels2 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.81 µmPixel pitch2.75 µm
7.9 µm²Pixel area7.58 µm²
12.66 MP/cm²Pixel density13.19 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight135 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 2300 and DC 3400 have the same sensor area. The DC 3400 has the lighter body. The DC 3400 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 3400 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 2300

Released in 2003, DC 2300 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.92 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC 3400

Released in 2004, DC 3400 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 2 MP effective resolution, and a 135 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras