CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ DC C1420
vs BenQ DC S1410

Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1420

BenQ / 2011

DC C1420

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC S1410

BenQ / 2011

DC S1410

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC C1420
28 mm²
DC S1410
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC C1420 and DC S1410 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC C1420MetricDC S1410
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
114 gWeight110 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC C1420 and DC S1410 have the same sensor area. The DC S1410 has the lighter body. The DC C1420 and DC S1410 have the same effective resolution. The DC C1420 and DC S1410 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC C1420

Released in 2011, DC C1420 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC S1410

Released in 2011, DC S1410 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras