CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ AC100
vs BenQ DC E1480

Archive illustration for BenQ AC100

BenQ / 2011

AC100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC E1480

BenQ / 2011

DC E1480

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
AC100
28 mm²
DC E1480
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The AC100 and DC E1480 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

AC100MetricDC E1480
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.43 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area2.03 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density49.19 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
117 gWeight110 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The AC100 and DC E1480 have the same sensor area. The DC E1480 has the lighter body. The AC100 and DC E1480 have the same effective resolution. The AC100 and DC E1480 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose AC100

Released in 2011, AC100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 117 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC E1480

Released in 2011, DC E1480 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 110 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras