CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

BenQ AC100
vs BenQ DC C1420

Archive illustration for BenQ AC100

BenQ / 2011

AC100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for BenQ DC C1420

BenQ / 2011

DC C1420

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
AC100
28 mm²
DC C1420
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The AC100 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

AC100MetricDC C1420
14 MPEffective pixels14 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.43 µmPixel pitch1.41 µm
2.03 µm²Pixel area1.98 µm²
49.19 MP/cm²Pixel density50.5 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
117 gWeight114 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The AC100 has the larger sensor area. The DC C1420 has the lighter body. The AC100 and DC C1420 have the same effective resolution. The AC100 and DC C1420 were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose AC100

Released in 2011, AC100 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 117 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC C1420

Released in 2011, DC C1420 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 114 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras