CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto sensor 505-X
vs Fujifilm Bigjob HD-3W

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto sensor 505-X

AgfaPhoto / 2009

sensor 505-X

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Fujifilm Bigjob HD-3W

Fujifilm / 2007

Bigjob HD-3W

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
sensor 505-X
25 mm²
Bigjob HD-3W
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The sensor 505-X and Bigjob HD-3W have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

sensor 505-XMetricBigjob HD-3W
5 MPEffective pixels6 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.03 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.14 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density24.15 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
85 gWeight385 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragexD Picture card
2x AAABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The sensor 505-X and Bigjob HD-3W have the same sensor area. The sensor 505-X has the lighter body. The Bigjob HD-3W has the higher effective resolution. The sensor 505-X is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose sensor 505-X

Released in 2009, sensor 505-X has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 85 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Bigjob HD-3W

Released in 2007, Bigjob HD-3W has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 385 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras