Reasons to choose Optima 8328m
Released in 2009, Optima 8328m has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Optima 8328m
vs AgfaPhoto sensor 830s
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Optima 8328m25 mm²
sensor 830s- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Optima 8328m and sensor 830s have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Optima 8328mMetricsensor 830s
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.76 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
3.11 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
32.21 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
120 gWeight120 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Optima 8328m and sensor 830s have the same sensor area. The Optima 8328m and sensor 830s have the same body weight. The Optima 8328m and sensor 830s have the same effective resolution. The Optima 8328m and sensor 830s were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose sensor 830s
Released in 2009, sensor 830s has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.