CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto DC-2030m
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 1338mT

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto DC-2030m

AgfaPhoto / 2009

DC-2030m

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Optima 1338mT

AgfaPhoto / 2009

Optima 1338mT

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC-2030m
28 mm²
Optima 1338mT
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC-2030m and Optima 1338mT have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DC-2030mMetricOptima 1338mT
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.69 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.85 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density35.14 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight130 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC-2030m and Optima 1338mT have the same sensor area. The DC-2030m has the lighter body. The DC-2030m has the higher effective resolution. The DC-2030m and Optima 1338mT were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC-2030m

Released in 2009, DC-2030m has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optima 1338mT

Released in 2009, Optima 1338mT has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras