CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto DC-2030m
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 103

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto DC-2030m

AgfaPhoto / 2009

DC-2030m

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Optima 103

AgfaPhoto / 2010

Optima 103

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC-2030m
28 mm²
Optima 103
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC-2030m and Optima 103 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC-2030mMetricOptima 103
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight100 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC-2030m and Optima 103 have the same sensor area. The DC-2030m has the lighter body. The DC-2030m and Optima 103 have the same effective resolution. The Optima 103 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC-2030m

Released in 2009, DC-2030m has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optima 103

Released in 2010, Optima 103 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras