CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto DC-2030m
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 1

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto DC-2030m

AgfaPhoto / 2009

DC-2030m

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Optima 1

AgfaPhoto / 2009

Optima 1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
DC-2030m
28 mm²
Optima 1
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The DC-2030m has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC-2030mMetricOptima 1
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC-2030m has the larger sensor area. The DC-2030m and Optima 1 have the same body weight. The DC-2030m and Optima 1 have the same effective resolution. The DC-2030m and Optima 1 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC-2030m

Released in 2009, DC-2030m has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Optima 1

Released in 2009, Optima 1 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras