CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto DC-1338sT
vs Olympus SP 320

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto DC-1338sT

AgfaPhoto / 2008

DC-1338sT

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus SP 320

Olympus / 2006

SP 320

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DC-1338sT
38 mm²
SP 320
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DC-1338sT and SP 320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC-1338sTMetricSP 320
10 MPEffective pixels7.41 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.95 µmPixel pitch2.26 µm
3.79 µm²Pixel area5.11 µm²
26.39 MP/cm²Pixel density19.55 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight180 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStoragexD Picture card
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC-1338sT and SP 320 have the same sensor area. The DC-1338sT has the lighter body. The DC-1338sT has the higher effective resolution. The DC-1338sT is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC-1338sT

Released in 2008, DC-1338sT has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SP 320

Released in 2006, SP 320 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 7.41 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras