Reasons to choose Compact 102
Released in 2009, Compact 102 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Compact 102
vs AgfaPhoto DC-600uw
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compact 10228 mm²
DC-600uw- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compact 102 and DC-600uw have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compact 102MetricDC-600uw
12 MPEffective pixels6 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density21.08 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight131 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2 x AA batteries (NiMH )
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compact 102 and DC-600uw have the same sensor area. The Compact 102 has the lighter body. The Compact 102 has the higher effective resolution. The Compact 102 and DC-600uw were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC-600uw
Released in 2009, DC-600uw has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 6 MP effective resolution, and a 131 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.