Reasons to choose Compact 102
Released in 2009, Compact 102 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Compact 102
vs AgfaPhoto DC-2030m
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
Compact 10228 mm²
DC-2030m- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compact 102 and DC-2030m have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compact 102MetricDC-2030m
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.54 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.37 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
42.17 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight—
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compact 102 and DC-2030m have the same sensor area. The DC-2030m has the lighter body. The Compact 102 and DC-2030m have the same effective resolution. The Compact 102 and DC-2030m were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose DC-2030m
Released in 2009, DC-2030m has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.