Reasons to choose Compact 100
Released in 2009, Compact 100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
AgfaPhoto Compact 100
vs AgfaPhoto Optima 830UW
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Compact 10025 mm²
Optima 830UW- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Compact 100 and Optima 830UW have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
Compact 100MetricOptima 830UW
10 MPEffective pixels8 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.76 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area3.11 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density32.21 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight158 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Compact 100 and Optima 830UW have the same sensor area. The Compact 100 has the lighter body. The Compact 100 has the higher effective resolution. The Compact 100 and Optima 830UW were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Optima 830UW
Released in 2009, Optima 830UW has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 158 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.