CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

AgfaPhoto Compact 100
vs AgfaPhoto DC-1033m

Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto Compact 100

AgfaPhoto / 2009

Compact 100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for AgfaPhoto DC-1033m

AgfaPhoto / 2009

DC-1033m

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Compact 100
25 mm²
DC-1033m
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Compact 100 and DC-1033m have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Compact 100MetricDC-1033m
10 MPEffective pixels10 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.58 µmPixel pitch1.58 µm
2.48 µm²Pixel area2.48 µm²
40.26 MP/cm²Pixel density40.26 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight125 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Compact 100 and DC-1033m have the same sensor area. The Compact 100 and DC-1033m have the same body weight. The Compact 100 and DC-1033m have the same effective resolution. The Compact 100 and DC-1033m were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Compact 100

Released in 2009, Compact 100 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC-1033m

Released in 2009, DC-1033m has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras