CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Acer CR-5130
vs Samsung Digimax 360

Archive illustration for Acer CR-5130

Acer / 2005

CR-5130

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung Digimax 360

Samsung / 2003

Digimax 360

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
CR-5130
38 mm²
Digimax 360
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CR-5130 and Digimax 360 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CR-5130MetricDigimax 360
5 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.75 µmPixel pitch3.44 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area11.84 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density8.44 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
210 gWeight165 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CR-5130 and Digimax 360 have the same sensor area. The Digimax 360 has the lighter body. The CR-5130 has the higher effective resolution. The CR-5130 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CR-5130

Released in 2005, CR-5130 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digimax 360

Released in 2003, Digimax 360 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 165 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras