CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Acer CR-5130
vs Olympus C-5000 Zoom

Archive illustration for Acer CR-5130

Acer / 2005

CR-5130

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-5000 Zoom

Olympus / 2003

C-5000 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
CR-5130
40 mm²
C-5000 Zoom
Area ratio
1.05:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
4.7%

The C-5000 Zoom has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

CR-5130MetricC-5000 Zoom
5 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.27 × 5.46
2.75 µmPixel pitch2.85 µm
7.58 µm²Pixel area8.1 µm²
13.19 MP/cm²Pixel density12.34 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.76
—Maximum video—
210 gWeight240 g
Secure DigitalStoragexD Picture card
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-5000 Zoom has the larger sensor area. The CR-5130 has the lighter body. The CR-5130 has the higher effective resolution. The CR-5130 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CR-5130

Released in 2005, CR-5130 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-5000 Zoom

Released in 2003, C-5000 Zoom has about 40 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 240 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras