CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Acer CL-5300
vs Acer CS-5531

Archive illustration for Acer CL-5300

Acer / 2006

CL-5300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Acer CS-5531

Acer / 2006

CS-5531

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
CL-5300
25 mm²
CS-5531
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CL-5300 and CS-5531 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CL-5300MetricCS-5531
5 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.23 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.97 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
20.13 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
85 gWeight180 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CL-5300 and CS-5531 have the same sensor area. The CL-5300 has the lighter body. The CL-5300 and CS-5531 have the same effective resolution. The CL-5300 and CS-5531 were both released in 2006. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CL-5300

Released in 2006, CL-5300 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 85 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose CS-5531

Released in 2006, CS-5531 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras