CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Acer CI-8330
vs Acer CR-6530

Archive illustration for Acer CI-8330

Acer / 2005

CI-8330

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Acer CR-6530

Acer / 2005

CR-6530

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
CI-8330
38 mm²
CR-6530
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CI-8330 and CR-6530 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CI-8330MetricCR-6530
8.24 MPEffective pixels6.3 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.14 µmPixel pitch2.45 µm
4.6 µm²Pixel area6.02 µm²
21.74 MP/cm²Pixel density16.62 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight210 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CI-8330 and CR-6530 have the same sensor area. The CI-8330 has the lighter body. The CI-8330 has the higher effective resolution. The CI-8330 and CR-6530 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CI-8330

Released in 2005, CI-8330 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.24 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose CR-6530

Released in 2005, CR-6530 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.3 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras