CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Acer CI-6330
vs Acer CR-8530

Archive illustration for Acer CI-6330

Acer / 2005

CI-6330

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Acer CR-8530

Acer / 2005

CR-8530

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
CI-6330
38 mm²
CR-8530
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CI-6330 and CR-8530 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CI-6330MetricCR-8530
6.16 MPEffective pixels8.05 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.48 µmPixel pitch2.17 µm
6.15 µm²Pixel area4.71 µm²
16.25 MP/cm²Pixel density21.24 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
160 gWeight150 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CI-6330 and CR-8530 have the same sensor area. The CR-8530 has the lighter body. The CR-8530 has the higher effective resolution. The CI-6330 and CR-8530 were both released in 2005. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CI-6330

Released in 2005, CI-6330 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.16 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose CR-8530

Released in 2005, CR-8530 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.05 MP effective resolution, and a 150 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras