DigicamDB
Side-by-side comparison

Ricoh GR IV
vs Fujifilm X-T50

Archive illustration for Ricoh GR IV

Ricoh / 2025

GR IV

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Fujifilm X-T50

Fujifilm / 2024

X-T50

Full specifications

Sensor area

361.15 mm²
GR IV
368.95 mm²
X-T50
Area ratio
1.02:1
Absolute difference
7.80 mm²
Relative difference
2%

The X-T50 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

GR IVMetricX-T50
25.7 MP
Effective pixels
40.2 MP
23.3 × 15.5
Sensor
23.5 × 15.7
3.75 µm
Pixel pitch
3.03 µm
14.05 µm²
Pixel area
9.18 µm²
7.12 MP/cm²
Pixel density
10.90 MP/cm²
1.55
Crop factor
1.53
1920 × 1080 / 60p
Maximum video
6240 × 3510 / 30p
262 g
Weight
438 g
SD UHS-I / internal storage
Storage
SD UHS-II
DB-120 Li-ion battery
Battery
NP-W126S Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The X-T50 has the larger sensor area. The GR IV has the lighter body. The X-T50 has the higher effective resolution. The GR IV is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose GR IV

Released in 2025, GR IV has about 361.15 mm² of sensor area, 25.7 MP effective resolution, and a 262 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose X-T50

Released in 2024, X-T50 has about 368.95 mm² of sensor area, 40.2 MP effective resolution, and a 438 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras

Ricoh GR IV vs Fujifilm X-T50: Specs Comparison